Processing math: 9%
+ - 0:00:00
Notes for current slide
Notes for next slide

2.3 — Cost Minimization

ECON 306 • Microeconomic Analysis • Spring 2022

Ryan Safner
Assistant Professor of Economics
safner@hood.edu
ryansafner/microS22
microS22.classes.ryansafner.com

Recall: The Firm's Two Problems

1st Stage: firm's profit maximization problem:

  1. Choose: < output >

  2. In order to maximize: < profits >

  • We'll cover this later...first we'll explore:

2nd Stage: firm's cost minimization problem:

  1. Choose: < inputs >

  2. In order to minimize: < cost >

  3. Subject to: < producing the optimal output >

  • Minimizing costs maximizing profits

Solving the Cost Minimization Problem

The Firm's Cost Minimization Problem

  • The firm's cost minimization problem is:
  1. Choose: < inputs: l,k>

  2. In order to minimize: < total cost: wl+rk >

  3. Subject to: < producing the optimal output: q=f(l,k) >

The Cost Minimization Problem: Tools

  • Our tools for firm's input choices:

  • Choice: combination of inputs (l,k)

  • Production function/isoquants: firm's technological constraints

    • How the firm trades off between inputs
  • Isocost line: firm's total cost (for given output and input prices)
    • How the market trades off between inputs

The Cost Minimization Problem: Verbally

  • The firms's cost minimization problem:

choose a combination of l and k to minimize total cost that produces the optimal amount of output

The Cost Minimization Problem: Math

min s.t. \quad q^*=f(l,k)

  • This requires calculus to solve. We will look at graphs instead!

The Firm's Least-Cost Input Combination: Graphically

  • Graphical solution: Lowest isocost line tangent to desired isoquant (A)

The Firm's Least-Cost Input Combination: Graphically

  • Graphical solution: Lowest isocost line tangent to desired isoquant (A)

  • B produces same output as A, but higher cost

  • C is same cost as A, but does not produce desired output

  • D is cheaper, does not produce desired output

The Firm's Least-Cost Input Combination: Why A?

\begin{align*} \color{green}{\text{Isoquant curve slope}} &= \color{red}{\text{Isocost line slope}} \\ \end{align*}

The Firm's Least-Cost Input Combination: Why A?

\begin{align*} \color{green}{\text{Isoquant curve slope}} &= \color{red}{\text{Isocost line slope}} \\ \color{green}{MRTS_{l,k}} &= \color{red}{\frac{w}{r}} \\ \color{green}{\frac{MP_l}{MP_k}} &= \color{red}{\frac{w}{r}} \\ \color{green}{0.5} &= \color{red}{0.5 } \\\end{align*}

  • Marginal benefit = Marginal cost

    • Firm would exchange at same rate as market
  • No other combination of (l,k) exists at current prices & output that could produce q^\star at lower cost!

Two Equivalent Rules

Rule 1

\frac{MP_l}{MP_k} = \frac{w}{r}

  • Easier for calculation (slopes)

Two Equivalent Rules

Rule 1

\frac{MP_l}{MP_k} = \frac{w}{r}

  • Easier for calculation (slopes)

Rule 2

\frac{MP_l}{w} = \frac{MP_k}{r}

  • Easier for intuition (next slide)

The Equimarginal Rule Again I

\frac{MP_l}{w} = \frac{MP_k}{r} = \cdots = \frac{MP_n}{p_n}

  • Equimarginal Rule: the cost of production is minimized where the marginal product per dollar spent is equalized across all n possible inputs

  • Firm will always choose an option that gives higher marginal product (e.g. if MP_l > MP_k)

    • But each option has a different cost, so we weight each option by its price, hence \frac{MP_n}{p_n}

The Equimarginal Rule Again II

  • Any optimum in economics: no better alternatives exist under current constraints

  • No possible change in your inputs to produce q^* that would lower cost

The Firm's Least-Cost Input Combination: Example

Example:

Your firm can use labor l and capital k to produce output according to the production function: q=2lk

The marginal products are:

\begin{align*} MP_l&=2k\\ MP_k&=2l\\\end{align*}

You want to produce 100 units, the price of labor is $10, and the price of capital is $5.

  1. What is the least-cost combination of labor and capital that produces 100 units of output?
  2. How much does this combination cost?

Returns to Scale

Returns to Scale

  • The returns to scale of production: change in output when all inputs are increased at the same rate (scale)

Returns to Scale

  • The returns to scale of production: change in output when all inputs are increased at the same rate (scale)

  • Constant returns to scale: output increases at same proportionate rate to inputs change

    • e.g. double all inputs, output doubles

Returns to Scale

  • The returns to scale of production: change in output when all inputs are increased at the same rate (scale)

  • Constant returns to scale: output increases at same proportionate rate to inputs change

    • e.g. double all inputs, output doubles
  • Increasing returns to scale: output increases more than proportionately to inputs change

    • e.g. double all inputs, output more than doubles

Returns to Scale

  • The returns to scale of production: change in output when all inputs are increased at the same rate (scale)

  • Constant returns to scale: output increases at same proportionate rate to inputs change

    • e.g. double all inputs, output doubles
  • Increasing returns to scale: output increases more than proportionately to inputs change

    • e.g. double all inputs, output more than doubles
  • Decreasing returns to scale: output increases less than proportionately to inputs change

    • e.g. double all inputs, output less than doubles

Returns to Scale: Example

Example: Do the following production functions exhibit constant returns to scale, increasing returns to scale, or decreasing returns to scale?

  1. q=4l+2k

  2. q=2lk

  3. q=2l^{0.3}k^{0.3}

Returns to Scale: Cobb-Douglas

  • One reason Cobb-Douglas functions are great: easy to determine returns to scale:
    q=Ak^\alpha l^\beta

  • \alpha + \beta = 1: constant returns to scale

  • \alpha + \beta >1: increasing returns to scale
  • \alpha + \beta <1: decreasing returns to scale

  • Note this trick only works for Cobb-Douglas functions!

Cobb-Douglas: Constant Returns Case

  • A common case of Cobb-Douglas is often written as:
    q=Ak^\alpha l^{1-\alpha} (i.e., the exponents sum to 1, constant returns)

  • \alpha is the output elasticity of capital

    • A 1% increase in k leads to an \alpha% increase in q
  • 1-\alpha is the output elasticity of labor

    • A 1% increase in l leads to a (1-\alpha)% increase in q

Output-Expansion Paths & Cost Curves

Goolsbee et. al (2011: 246)

  • Output Expansion Path: curve illustrating the changes in the optimal mix of inputs and the total cost to produce an increasing amount of output

  • Total Cost curve: curve showing the total cost of producing different amounts of output (next class)

  • See next class' notes page to see how we go from our least-cost combinations over a range of outputs to derive a total cost function

Recall: The Firm's Two Problems

1st Stage: firm's profit maximization problem:

  1. Choose: < output >

  2. In order to maximize: < profits >

  • We'll cover this later...first we'll explore:

2nd Stage: firm's cost minimization problem:

  1. Choose: < inputs >

  2. In order to minimize: < cost >

  3. Subject to: < producing the optimal output >

  • Minimizing costs \iff maximizing profits

Paused

Help

Keyboard shortcuts

, , Pg Up, k Go to previous slide
, , Pg Dn, Space, j Go to next slide
Home Go to first slide
End Go to last slide
Number + Return Go to specific slide
b / m / f Toggle blackout / mirrored / fullscreen mode
c Clone slideshow
p Toggle presenter mode
t Restart the presentation timer
?, h Toggle this help
oTile View: Overview of Slides
Esc Back to slideshow