1st Stage: firm's profit maximization problem:
Choose: < output >
In order to maximize: < profits >
2nd Stage: firm's cost minimization problem:
Choose: < inputs >
In order to minimize: < cost >
Subject to: < producing the optimal output >
Choose: < inputs: l,k>
In order to minimize: < total cost: wl+rk >
Subject to: < producing the optimal output: q∗=f(l,k) >
Our tools for firm's input choices:
Choice: combination of inputs (l,k)
Production function/isoquants: firm's technological constraints
choose a combination of l and k to minimize total cost that produces the optimal amount of output
min s.t. \quad q^*=f(l,k)
Graphical solution: Lowest isocost line tangent to desired isoquant (A)
B produces same output as A, but higher cost
C is same cost as A, but does not produce desired output
D is cheaper, does not produce desired output
\begin{align*} \color{green}{\text{Isoquant curve slope}} &= \color{red}{\text{Isocost line slope}} \\ \end{align*}
\begin{align*} \color{green}{\text{Isoquant curve slope}} &= \color{red}{\text{Isocost line slope}} \\ \color{green}{MRTS_{l,k}} &= \color{red}{\frac{w}{r}} \\ \color{green}{\frac{MP_l}{MP_k}} &= \color{red}{\frac{w}{r}} \\ \color{green}{0.5} &= \color{red}{0.5 } \\\end{align*}
Marginal benefit = Marginal cost
No other combination of (l,k) exists at current prices & output that could produce q^\star at lower cost!
\frac{MP_l}{MP_k} = \frac{w}{r}
\frac{MP_l}{MP_k} = \frac{w}{r}
\frac{MP_l}{w} = \frac{MP_k}{r}
\frac{MP_l}{w} = \frac{MP_k}{r} = \cdots = \frac{MP_n}{p_n}
Equimarginal Rule: the cost of production is minimized where the marginal product per dollar spent is equalized across all n possible inputs
Firm will always choose an option that gives higher marginal product (e.g. if MP_l > MP_k)
Any optimum in economics: no better alternatives exist under current constraints
No possible change in your inputs to produce q^* that would lower cost
Example:
Your firm can use labor l and capital k to produce output according to the production function: q=2lk
The marginal products are:
\begin{align*} MP_l&=2k\\ MP_k&=2l\\\end{align*}
You want to produce 100 units, the price of labor is $10, and the price of capital is $5.
The returns to scale of production: change in output when all inputs are increased at the same rate (scale)
Constant returns to scale: output increases at same proportionate rate to inputs change
The returns to scale of production: change in output when all inputs are increased at the same rate (scale)
Constant returns to scale: output increases at same proportionate rate to inputs change
Increasing returns to scale: output increases more than proportionately to inputs change
The returns to scale of production: change in output when all inputs are increased at the same rate (scale)
Constant returns to scale: output increases at same proportionate rate to inputs change
Increasing returns to scale: output increases more than proportionately to inputs change
Decreasing returns to scale: output increases less than proportionately to inputs change
Example: Do the following production functions exhibit constant returns to scale, increasing returns to scale, or decreasing returns to scale?
q=4l+2k
q=2lk
q=2l^{0.3}k^{0.3}
One reason Cobb-Douglas functions are great: easy to determine returns to scale:
q=Ak^\alpha l^\beta
\alpha + \beta = 1: constant returns to scale
\alpha + \beta <1: decreasing returns to scale
Note this trick only works for Cobb-Douglas functions!
A common case of Cobb-Douglas is often written as:
q=Ak^\alpha l^{1-\alpha}
(i.e., the exponents sum to 1, constant returns)
\alpha is the output elasticity of capital
1-\alpha is the output elasticity of labor
Goolsbee et. al (2011: 246)
Output Expansion Path: curve illustrating the changes in the optimal mix of inputs and the total cost to produce an increasing amount of output
Total Cost curve: curve showing the total cost of producing different amounts of output (next class)
See next class' notes page to see how we go from our least-cost combinations over a range of outputs to derive a total cost function
1st Stage: firm's profit maximization problem:
Choose: < output >
In order to maximize: < profits >
2nd Stage: firm's cost minimization problem:
Choose: < inputs >
In order to minimize: < cost >
Subject to: < producing the optimal output >
Keyboard shortcuts
↑, ←, Pg Up, k | Go to previous slide |
↓, →, Pg Dn, Space, j | Go to next slide |
Home | Go to first slide |
End | Go to last slide |
Number + Return | Go to specific slide |
b / m / f | Toggle blackout / mirrored / fullscreen mode |
c | Clone slideshow |
p | Toggle presenter mode |
t | Restart the presentation timer |
?, h | Toggle this help |
o | Tile View: Overview of Slides |
Esc | Back to slideshow |
1st Stage: firm's profit maximization problem:
Choose: < output >
In order to maximize: < profits >
2nd Stage: firm's cost minimization problem:
Choose: < inputs >
In order to minimize: < cost >
Subject to: < producing the optimal output >
Choose: < inputs: l, k>
In order to minimize: < total cost: wl+rk >
Subject to: < producing the optimal output: q^*=f(l,k) >
Our tools for firm's input choices:
Choice: combination of inputs (l, k)
Production function/isoquants: firm's technological constraints
choose a combination of l and k to minimize total cost that produces the optimal amount of output
\min_{l,k} wl+rk s.t. \quad q^*=f(l,k)
Graphical solution: Lowest isocost line tangent to desired isoquant (A)
B produces same output as A, but higher cost
C is same cost as A, but does not produce desired output
D is cheaper, does not produce desired output
\begin{align*} \color{green}{\text{Isoquant curve slope}} &= \color{red}{\text{Isocost line slope}} \\ \end{align*}
\begin{align*} \color{green}{\text{Isoquant curve slope}} &= \color{red}{\text{Isocost line slope}} \\ \color{green}{MRTS_{l,k}} &= \color{red}{\frac{w}{r}} \\ \color{green}{\frac{MP_l}{MP_k}} &= \color{red}{\frac{w}{r}} \\ \color{green}{0.5} &= \color{red}{0.5 } \\\end{align*}
Marginal benefit = Marginal cost
No other combination of (l,k) exists at current prices & output that could produce q^\star at lower cost!
\frac{MP_l}{MP_k} = \frac{w}{r}
\frac{MP_l}{MP_k} = \frac{w}{r}
\frac{MP_l}{w} = \frac{MP_k}{r}
\frac{MP_l}{w} = \frac{MP_k}{r} = \cdots = \frac{MP_n}{p_n}
Equimarginal Rule: the cost of production is minimized where the marginal product per dollar spent is equalized across all n possible inputs
Firm will always choose an option that gives higher marginal product (e.g. if MP_l > MP_k)
Any optimum in economics: no better alternatives exist under current constraints
No possible change in your inputs to produce q^* that would lower cost
Example:
Your firm can use labor l and capital k to produce output according to the production function: q=2lk
The marginal products are:
\begin{align*} MP_l&=2k\\ MP_k&=2l\\\end{align*}
You want to produce 100 units, the price of labor is $10, and the price of capital is $5.
The returns to scale of production: change in output when all inputs are increased at the same rate (scale)
Constant returns to scale: output increases at same proportionate rate to inputs change
The returns to scale of production: change in output when all inputs are increased at the same rate (scale)
Constant returns to scale: output increases at same proportionate rate to inputs change
Increasing returns to scale: output increases more than proportionately to inputs change
The returns to scale of production: change in output when all inputs are increased at the same rate (scale)
Constant returns to scale: output increases at same proportionate rate to inputs change
Increasing returns to scale: output increases more than proportionately to inputs change
Decreasing returns to scale: output increases less than proportionately to inputs change
Example: Do the following production functions exhibit constant returns to scale, increasing returns to scale, or decreasing returns to scale?
q=4l+2k
q=2lk
q=2l^{0.3}k^{0.3}
One reason Cobb-Douglas functions are great: easy to determine returns to scale:
q=Ak^\alpha l^\beta
\alpha + \beta = 1: constant returns to scale
\alpha + \beta <1: decreasing returns to scale
Note this trick only works for Cobb-Douglas functions!
A common case of Cobb-Douglas is often written as:
q=Ak^\alpha l^{1-\alpha}
(i.e., the exponents sum to 1, constant returns)
\alpha is the output elasticity of capital
1-\alpha is the output elasticity of labor
Goolsbee et. al (2011: 246)
Output Expansion Path: curve illustrating the changes in the optimal mix of inputs and the total cost to produce an increasing amount of output
Total Cost curve: curve showing the total cost of producing different amounts of output (next class)
See next class' notes page to see how we go from our least-cost combinations over a range of outputs to derive a total cost function